APAC CIOOutlook
About UsConferencePartner With Us
  • Technologies
    • Blockchain
      Data Intelligence and Management
      Digital Transformation
      FinTech
      Generative and Agentic AI
      Low Code No Code
      Mobile Application
      Networking
      Robotics
      Storage
      Wireless
  • Industries
    • Automotive
      Aviation
      Banking
      Construction
      E-Commerce
      Food and Beverages
      Healthcare
      Insurance
      Logistics
      Manufacturing
      Retail
      Supply Chain
      Travel and Hospitality
  • Platforms
    • Microsoft
      Salesforce
      SAP
  • Strategic Solutions
    • Business Intelligence
      Contact Center
      Corporate Finance
      CRM
      Cyber Security
      Data Center
      Enterprise Asset Management
      Enterprise Performance Management
      IT Infrastructure and Services
      Managed Services
      Procurement
      Unified Communication
      Workflow
  • Home
  • CXO Insights
  • Leadership Perspectives
  • Innovation Insights
  • Research
  • News
  • Whitepapers
  • CXO Awards
#

Apac CIOOutlook Weekly Brief

×

Be first to read the latest tech news, Industry Leader's Insights, and CIO interviews of medium and large enterprises exclusively from Apac CIOOutlook

Subscribe

loading

THANK YOU FOR SUBSCRIBING

A featured contribution from Leadership Perspectives: a curated forum reserved for leaders nominated by our subscribers and vetted by the Construction Tech Review Advisory Board.

Medtronic

Neel Augusthy, CFO SEA

Business Strategy and Management

Neel Augusthy

Neel Augusthy

Business strategy is generally considered the domain of those who have experienced life and feel the need to profess. What you also see in most cases, is people in Management positions who feel they are the most suited to do so.

In most organizations, there is almost a childlike enthusiasm to develop strategies. And they do get developed for everything from the car park to the next ten years of market share expansion and marketing of new products being developed.

There are sizeable teams that work on market data, the organizations penetration into the said market or region, the speed at which this battle would ensue and also the spoils that victory would bring. The complicated models secure many jobs for years on end. Once done, the next phase becomes the ever so important presentation that must be done to get the views of the organizational professors who have been there and done that. Thumbs up and its cheers and celebrations on a significant milestone achieved.

Once done, it’s time to start working on the next best thing, another strategy that is going to move the proverbial needle so far that most odometers would be ashamed of themselves. Organizations go through this process of business strategy multiple times a year, year on year. I have always wondered how many actually believe that the effort they spent in building these strategies have actually paid the returns that the sophisticated models promised.

Having spent time at both ends of the spectrum, you come to realize that business strategy is only as good as the execution that accompanies it.

In a lot of cases, what tends to happen is the team that develops the strategy tends not to be the team that executes it. [CIOS_QUOTES_REPLACE] The execution team is given a play book of how the model was developed, what they should do to get it right without necessarily buying into the process. I have come across in my career senior leaders who are so confident about their abilities as strategists, they practically give you a roadmap to life only issue being it’s their life and not yours that they give you the plan to and then wonder why you can’t get anything right.

Good strategies need to ensure that the team that will eventually execute is a core part of the team that develops it. This, however, is just the start. What you almost need with all such plans, is a resident cynic who is willing to poke a hole in every assumption that you come up with not because that is what they enjoy doing but because they help you see through your biases and blind spots. I remember a market penetration strategy where our organization which had a four percent market share in a commoditized industry was going to capture 40 percent of the market in two years because of a key ingredient (giving no heed to the fact that the market leader with seven percent share had a similar product that was not doing well).

Developing strategies is by no means an easy task, hence, it’s a path one should tread on with caution. It is resource intensive and gives you more heart ache than a Paris catwalk would. Far too many organizations embark on multiple business strategies crisscrossing each other several times over that any quantification becomes almost impossible. Organizations should be very clear on what really needs a strategy and they should be very few in numbers. The rest of the organizational effort should go into executing these few strategies.

Where management plays a big part is in ensuring that execution takes place but also in ensuring that strategies developed are executable and teams are held accountable. Too many times, teams are not held accountable for the projects and strategies that they work on; failure almost becomes a rite of passage to the next big strategy.

Business strategy is about taking the organization to the next level. Updated research is clearly showing that working on multiple critical projects at that same time for individuals is actually counterproductive. Organizations are no different; they are a collective of individuals who by their nature can only work on a few things well at any given time. When you apply the permutations that get thrown up with multiple strategies being worked on, no wonder organizations suffer from strategy paralysis.

I like to think of business strategy as the focus that an organization needs to develop in moving itself into a superior position where less is more. Management, ministers must ensure that focus on the few is paramount over the excitement of chasing every new shiny idea down. That being said, Execution will always be King!
The articles from these contributors are based on their personal expertise and viewpoints, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of their employers or affiliated organizations.
The Leadership Perspectives forum brings together voices shaping construction technology and innovation. Participation is by invitation only. It features leaders who are not merely observing technological change, but actively contributing to it through digital transformation and execution-driven insights.
EDITOR'S CHOICE
  • Willis Towers Watson

    Just Group [GBX: JUST.L]

    Empowering Retail through Customer-First Technology Adoption Strategy

    Frank De Sa, Chief Information Officer

  • Willis Towers Watson

    ISS Facility Services Australia & New Zealand

    The Right Technology And Reliable Partners; The Business Next Frontier

    Luke O'Brien, CIO

  • Willis Towers Watson

    BPAY Group

    Building BPAY Group's New Digital Foundation

    Angela Donohoe, Chief Information Officer

  • Willis Towers Watson

    Bvn Architecture

    How Have Recent Advancements in Big Data Been Impacting Businesses?

    Marc Solomon, CIO

I agree We use cookies on this website to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies. More info

APAC CIOOutlook
Follow on LinkedIn

About

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Partner With Us

Stay Connected

  • Subscribe
  • Newsletter
  • Sitemap

Contact Us

  • editor@apacciooutlook.com
  • sales@apacciooutlook.com
  • marketing@apacciooutlook.com

Legal

  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

© 2026 APAC CIOOutlook. All rights reserved. Headquarteblue in Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.

This content is copyright protected

However, if you would like to share the information in this article, you may use the link below:

https://contactless-payments.apacciooutlook.com/leadership-perspective/business-strategy-and-management-nwid-4539.html